| January 16-30, 2003 / US-Canada | ||||||||||
![]()
|
||||||||||
ISNA
announces Eid dates in accordance with Saudis rather than Islam
By
Zafar Bangash The
Fiqh Council of North America, which is linked to the Islamic Society
of North America (ISNA), has issued an astonishing statement regarding
the date of Eid al-Adha, which amounts to a recommendation that Muslims
ignore the commandments of Allah. The statement recommends that Muslims follow
the Saudis in determining the date of Eid al-Adha in preference to the
commandments of the Qur’an, despite the Saudis’ established record of
marking the two Eids, and other key dates, on the wrong days.
It
is now well established that the Saudi regime uses the birth of the moon,
instead of the sighting criterion, to determine the dates.
To go along with the Saudis is to go against the commandments of
Allah and the Sunnah of Rasool-Allah (saw), which is a grave sin. No amount of sophistry about Muslim unity can
change this fact, although the Fiqh Council is trying to obscure it. The
Fiqh Council’s statement, issued last November, reads in part: “Last year,
the Fiqh Council of North America recommended to the Shura Council of
North America that the determination of Eidul Adha be based on sighting
the Crescent in North America. This recommendation was based on numerous
Fatwas of several prominent scholars from various parts of the world.
They indicated that there is no sound basis for distinction between the
determination of Ramadan and Eidul Adha, either by unity of Matla’
or difference of Matla’.” (The full text of this statement can
be found at the website www.moonsighting.com.) The
Fiqh Council statement admits its longstanding position to determine the
beginning and end of Ramadhan on the basis of sighting the crescent in
North America. Determination of Eid al-Adha on the same basis is seen
as being more consistent. It also
admits that a considerable proportion of the Muslim community in North
America appears more inclined to the above “fatwas”.
The problem with its statement arises when it asserts that the
Fiqh Council’s decision to adopt these “fatwas” is motivated by the desire
that “there may be greater unity among Muslims.”
Muslims do not need the fatwas of scholars about issues on which
there are clear instructions in the Qur’an and numerous authentic ahadith
of the Prophet (saw). Fatwas
are needed on issues about which there are no clear injunctions. The
statement goes on to say that the “recommendation” was “contingent on
educating the Muslim community prior to Eid about the impending change
and the reasons behind it.” Instead
there were heated arguments and less unity.
Now the Fiqh Council has decided to go back to the practices of
jahiliyya by adopting a position that is not based on the Qur’an
and the Sunnah of Allah’s Messenger (saw). Can
unity among Muslims be achieved by violating the commands of Allah? Is there anything in the Qur’an or ahadith
literature that tells us that we must follow those who control Makkah,
and must determine the day of Eid al-Adha by the arbitrary determination
of the days of Hajj by the occupiers of the Haramain?
There is the well-known example of Abdullah ibn Mas’ud (ra),
one of the Prophet’s Companions, who went to Makkah for Hajj according
to the moonsighting in Madinah. He
planned to arrive in Makkah on the eighth of Dhul Hijjah; when he arrived
there, the people were already in Arafat.
Upon enquiry, he was told that the moon had been sighted earlier
in Makkah and that it was the ninth of Dhul Hijjah, the Day of Arafat.
Neither during the time of the Prophet (saw) nor during that of his
illustrious Companions, may Allah be pleased with them all, was there
any attempt to determine when the people of Makkah were going to perform
Hajj so that the rest of the Muslims could celebrate Eid al-Adha the following
day. So how can Muslims now introduce
such bid’ahs and claim to be serving the cause of Muslim unity? Who
are these so-called scholars who have the cheek to advise us to disobey
Allah (astaghfirullah) for the sake of ‘unity’?
And who are the scholars whose “fatwas” are considered to take
precedence over the commands of the Qur’an and the Prophet (saw)? It is
utterly unacceptable to claim that “there is room in Islamic Fiqh to adopt
a weaker, but still acceptable opinion if that achieves greater benefit
(maslaha); in that case greater unity.”
This is nonsense. Muslims cannot obtain benefits by flouting Allah’s
clear commands; real benefits can accrue to us only in complete obedience
to Allah. |
||||||||||