|
Documents reveal
US hand behind massacres during Suharto’s coup in Indonesia
As Indonesians
celebrated their independence from Holland in 1945 on
August 17, western governments congratulated president
Megawati Sukarnoputri. But Indonesians took their warm
sentiments with generous pinches of salt: their expression
had coincided with the publication of details of the
role played 35 years ago by the US and Britain in the
overthrow of Sukarno, who was leader of Indonesia’s
independence movement and its first president.
Sukarno
was driven from power by a slow-motion coup (1965-1967)
in which more than one million supposed communists were
butchered. The Americans provided lists of those to
be murdered, and a British-run propaganda machine portrayed
the massacres (1965) as a ‘clean-up operation’ against
an imaginary communist uprising. The information services
of the world’s two noisiest advocates of democracy also
misrepresented general Suharto, who succeeded Sukarno
in 1967, as a "Mr Clean" who had only his
country’s interests at heart. The role of both countries
in what has been described as "one of history’s
worst ever blood-baths" is not in doubt: it is
revealed in both US and British documents that have
come to light recently.
The American
documents are contained in a book, produced by the State
Department, which records US diplomatic and intelligence
activities in Indonesia during 1965 and 1966. It shows,
for instance, how the US embassy in Jakarta provided
general Suharto’s murder squads with a list of top leaders
of the PKI, the Communist Party opposition at the time.
The list was handed over during the massacre of alleged
communists in 1965. The book also throws light on the
US’s involvement in the slaughter of people who it says
were 100,000 communists, but who may have been more
than one million supposed communist sympathisers. The
National Security Archive, a non-profit research institute
in Washington which campaigns for access to official
documents, obtained a copy of the book after it was
sent to government bookstores by accident.
In December
1965 Marshall Green, the US ambassador, "endorsed
a 50 million rupiah (£3,500) covert payment to the Kap-Gestapu
movement leading the repression". Other documents
comment on the number of ‘communists’ killed. "We
frankly do not know whether the real figure of Communists
that have been killed is closer to 100,000 or 1 million
but believe it is wiser to err on the side of the lower
estimate, especially when questioned by the press."
The document had been sent to the state department from
Jakarta. Another document boasts that the chances of
the US’s role in the massacres being exposed are low.
"The chances of detection ... of our support in
this instance are as minimal as any black bag operation
can be."
Other
documents in the US national archives in fact show that
the plot by Washington to remove Sukarno began in 1960,
when the US defence and state departments secretly informed
the head of the Indonesian military that Washington
would provide military and economic assistance in any
showdown with the Indonesian Communist Party. Two years
later, a document recorded US president John F Kennedy
and British prime minister Harold Macmillian agreeing
that it was desirable to "liquidate" Sukarno.
The implementation
of the plot began in October 1965, when, in what was
alleged to be a left-wing coup attempt, six right-wing
generals were murdered. General Suharto exploited this
incident, which was almost certainly arranged by the
US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), to massacre the
alleged communists, purge the Indonesian military of
pro-Sukarno officers, and remove the highly popular
president, replacing him in 1967. It was because of
Sukarno’s popularity that the coup was pushed through
so slowly. The Americans were against taking on Sukarno
in case this led to a popular uprising.
After
Suharto became president, the British and American propaganda
machines portrayed him as an incorruptible leader who
had acted to save his country. Western journalists,
who had been kept out of Indonesia during the coup,
were forced to make do with the propaganda that American
and British diplomats were giving out. Typical of the
‘information’ fed to the media was a report in the Atlantic
Monthly: "Suharto is regarded by Indonesians who
know him well as incorruptible... In attacking the communists,
he was not acting as a western puppet; he was doing
simply what he believed to be best for Indonesia."
Roland
Challis, a former BBC south Asia correspondent, has
described how British diplomats planted misleading stories
in British newspapers. Challis quotes Norman Reddaway,
a foreign propaganda expert, as telling him in October
1965 that his brief was "to do anything you can
think of"’ to get rid of president Sukarno. Writing
in the Sunday Times on July 29, Challis has described
the foreign office propaganda campaign as "brilliantly
executed", adding that it "largely succeeded
in misrepresenting the 1965 slaughter as a clean-up
operation against a non-existent communist uprising."
Both Washington
and London had strong reasons to want to get rid of
Sukarno. The US wanted to keep communism out of the
region and to isolate China, and Sukarno was too independent
to cooperate. Britain was engaged in withdrawing from
its colonies in the region, while securing its economic
and political interests there. It was intending, for
example, to include Singapore in a federation with Malaya
to be known as Malaysia, but Sukarno was in the way.
Washington
was also, of course, interested in the region’s resources.
It was standard practice to eliminate regional leaders
who put the interests of their own countries first.
Patrick Lumumba of the former Belgian Congo was assassinated
with the connivance of Belgium, the US and the UN. Both
Indonesia and the Congo are huge countries blessed with
enormous resources; both have been blighted by the intervention
of imperial powers with their eyes on those resources.
They are not, of course, the only countries to have
suffered such persecutions and, like the rest, they
are unlikely to obtain the compensation to which they
are entitled.
|