|
Eid Milad un-Nabi
: an opportunity to broaden our perception of the Seerah
As
Muslims all over the world celebrate the birthday of
the noble Prophet Muhammad sall’Allahu alaihi wa
sallam, ZAFAR BANGASH, Director of the Institute
of Contemporary Islamic Thought (ICIT), discusses the
Prophet’s role in bringing about change in society.
Muslims
throughout the world celebrate the birthday of the noble
Messenger of Allah with great veneration. Elaborate
programmes are held every Rabi al-Awwal, the month in
which the Prophet was born, when na’ats and qasidas
are composed, recited and memorized. This year has been
no exception. While this reflects the deep love and
reverence Muslims bear the Prophet, it also highlights
the Muslims’ lack of understanding or appreciation of
the role he played in bringing about change in society.
Surely the Prophet was not sent merely so that we could
celebrate his birthday without understanding the purpose
of his mission in life?
Two factors
appear to be responsible for our faulty perception of
the Prophet’s Seerah (life-history): since only a few
of the estimated 124,000 Prophets exercised worldly
authority and power, Muslims have assumed that such
affairs are outside the domain of Prophetic purpose.
Second, since politics has come to be considered for
the non-pious, indeed for the biggest crooks, many people
ask how the Prophet, who brought Allah’s final message
to mankind, could be involved in politics. This reflects
Muslims’ lack of understanding of both politics and
Prophetic history. True, few Prophets, with the exception
of Prophets Yusuf, Daud and Sulaiman (a.s.) ruled anywhere,
but this does not mean that ruling a people falls beyond
Prophetic responsibility.
Even if
most Prophets did not acquire power, they exercised
authority which was conferred upon them by Allah’s divine
writ. Such authority was not conditional upon validation
by the people; they exercised it under divine command
despite lacking the means to impose it. Since the Prophet
Muhammad (saw) is the last and final Messenger of Allah
with whom the deen of Allah was perfected and completed
for mankind (al-Qur’an 5:03), it had to encompass all
aspects of life. Politics is not and could not be separated
from other aspects of life. In fact, the political dimension
was an essential part of the Prophet’s message because
Allah did not want any field of human endeavour to be
without a practical example. In this as in all other
fields, the noble messenger of Allah was singularly
successful because Allah wanted to present a model (33:21)
for his servants for all time.
Throughout
history societies have undergone change; some were dramatic,
such as the French and communist revolutions, but in
almost all cases the balance of political and economic
power merely shifted from one class of people to another
without addressing the underlying injustices that brought
about the revolution, or affecting people’s social and
moral values or priorities. The change that the noble
of Messenger of Allah (saw) effected was both profound
and comprehensive: it transformed individuals as well
as societies.
In bringing
about such transformation the Prophet, however, promised
neither wealth nor power to attract people to his mission,
as is customary with many political parties and groups
these days; nor did he instigate class warfare despite
great disparities in wealth, nor launch a movement merely
to rectify people’s personal, marital or familial morals,
although Arabian society was steeped in immorality and
corruption. For 13 years in Makkah, he emphasized one
point above all others: the Oneness of Allah subhanahu
wa ta’ala. The kalimah may seem a simple statement,
but in that idol-ridden and materialistic society it
signalled an ideological challenge that had profound
implications. This explains why it aroused so much hostility
from the Makkan aristocracy.
The Prophet
(saw) transformed the whole of the Arabian Peninsula
in the relatively short period of 23 years. The hopelessly
divided warring tribes and clans he organised into an
Islamic state that not only defeated both superpowers
of the time but also went on to dominate the world for
more than a thousand years. What methods and processes
did he employ to bring about such profound changes at
the individual as well as collective levels? These are
questions we need to address by studying the Seerah
from a new, more dynamic perspective. The Seerah must
not be viewed merely as a series of disjointed events
with earlier actions having no discernible relation
to subsequent developments but as part of the divine
scheme to transform humanity by bringing it into conformity
with Allah’s Purpose and Laws.
The Qur’an
says that the noble Messenger of Allah (saw) was sent
not only to inform but to transform humanity by bringing
it "out of darkness into light" (65:11). Clearly,
the Prophet’s role as the last and final Messenger of
Allah (33:40) and as the "best of exemplars"
(33:21) was not confined to a specific time, as Dr Kalim
Siddiqui has observed in his ground-breaking paper,
"Political Dimensions of the Seerah" (ICIT,
1998, p.1). The Prophet’s method is applicable to all
times but, as Muslims consider transforming their societies
by applying the Prophet’s Seerah and Sunnah (life-example),
it may be argued that we face a very different historical
situation, the greatest difference being the absence
of the Prophet himself. His presence at the advent of
Islam was a source of inspiration and an enormous advantage
that the Muslims are deprived of today.
There
are other differences as well: the Arabian society of
the Prophet’s era was small, comprising a few thousand
people in Makkah and a similar number in Madinah. The
Arabian Peninsula as a whole had several hundred thousand
inhabitants; today, the world’s population is more than
six billion, with Muslims comprising about one-fifth
of this total. Should Muslims be required to transform
their societies in 23 years as the Prophet, starting
with a handful of followers, did in Arabia? Is there
a time-constraint within which change must be achieved?
These
differences — the Prophet’s physical absence, and the
much larger scale today — should not overwhelm us, however.
We enjoy certain advantages as well; the Prophet had
to convince the mushrikeen at a time when the Qur’an
was gradually being revealed to him; today there are
already 1.2 billion Muslims, in possession of the entire
Qur’an, as well as the Seerah and Sunnah of the noble
Prophet. True, the Muslims are disconnected from Islam
and the Seerah, but this is precisely the challenge
to us today. We have to make the Seerah relevant to
our lives by understanding it as it was meant to be
understood and followed. There are other impediments
as well: kufr has not only become globalized but it
has also penetrated the House of Islam. Yet the Seerah
as a model is the divine prescription for humanity and
it must be extendable to every situation, regardless
of different historical time periods.
The process
of transformation, however, requires first a clear understanding
of the nature of the environment in society, and of
what is to replace it. During the Prophet’s time, Arabia
was steeped in jahiliyyah (primitive savagery) in which
idol-worship formed the principal mode of religious,
social and cultural bahaviour. People believed in Allah
but associated partners with Him, hence their designation
as "mushrikeen" in the Qur’an. Injustice,
oppression, tribal arrogance (and therefore tribal warfare
born of such arrogance) and female infanticide as well
as slavery were other practices that characterised Arabian
society at the time. Today Muslims are afflicted by
many of the same problems; idol-worship has been replaced
by the worship of nationalism, money and class interests.
Injustice and oppression are as rampant and widespread
in Muslim societies today as they were in Arabia at
the advent of Islam. It is therefore imperative for
Muslims to understand the nature of the dhulm and darkness
that surround them as they embark on the process of
transforming their societies. Their success or failure
will be determined by their proximity to the Prophetic
Sunnah and Seerah.
The Muslims’
present attitude can be compared to an episode in early
Islamic history. Before the Treaty of Hudaibiyya (6AH),
the mushrikeen of Makkah sent a number of emissaries
to negotiate with the Prophet. One of the Quraish delegates,
Urwa ibn Masood Thaqafi, noted his companions’ reverence
for the Prophet: they would not let even the water he
used for wudhu fall to the ground; they rubbed it on
their bodies as a way of asking for blessing. When Urwa
returned to his fellow chiefs, he advised them against
fighting a people so dedicated to their leader. There
was also somthing else that Urwa did not witness that
is relevant to our discussion: with the exception of
one man, each of the 1,400 companions of the Prophet
gave bay’a (described in the Qur’an as Bay’t ar-Ridwan,
48:18) that they would fight to the last man if war
were imposed on them. This they did because of a rumour
that Uthman ibn Affan, the Prophet’s emissary sent to
Makkah to negotiate with the Quraish, had been murdered.
The situation
facing the Muslims was grim: there were only 1,400 of
them, far away from Madinah and armed with only a sword
each; there was no prospect of help from any quarter,
nor the possibility of escape if they were defeated.
Yet their commitment was so great that they were prepared
to face every eventuality. The difference in attitude
between the early Muslims and today’s is that today’s
Muslims would readily splash the Prophet’s wudhu water
on their bodies, but would refuse to make their own
Bay’at ar-Ridwan! So why does it surprise us that Allah’s
promised help (47:7) does not come to us? Is following
the Prophet’s Sunnah and Seerah nothing more than splashing
perfume on our bodies, vigorously doing miswak and gobbling
large amounts of halwa, as some of us have come to believe?
Allah
declares in the noble Qur’an: "He [Allah] it is
Who sent the Messenger with clear guidance and the Deen
of Truth so that it becomes dominant over all other
systems, however much the mushrikeen may oppose it"
(9:33 and 61:11). Islam became dominant during the lifetime
of the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he had only a handful
of followers; despite there being more than 1.2 billion
Muslims in the world today we are humiliated and oppressed.
The darkness that prevailed in Arabia at the time of
the Prophet has once again engulfed the world, on a
much greater scale. If we really want to emerge from
this total darkness, then the only option available
to us is to follow the Prophet’s example, beginning
by understanding it in all its dimensions.
To begin
with, Islam was spread only among the Prophet’s close
relatives and friends. Then Allah commanded him to proclaim
it openly (surahs 73 and 74). Thereafter, the message
was announced in public meetings, market-places and
the Ka’aba, despite the clear risk to the Prophet’s
person and life, and those of other Muslims. The declaration
of Islam was necessary in order to challenge the socio-political
order of Makkah and pave the way for the implemention
of the Islamic order.
The terror
unleashed by the Makkan aristocracy was also to be expected
because their vested interests were threatened. The
Prophet’s 13 years in Makkah were spent under extremely
harsh conditions. He and the small group of Muslims
not only suffered ridicule, persecution, torture and
exile but also a three-year embargo in which they were
isolated in Sh’ab Abi Talib. Why did the noble Messenger
and his followers have to suffer so much? Was it merely
for preaching a spirituality devoid of worldly relevance,
or for inviting people to participate in sessions of
transcendental meditation to escape the drudgery of
life (as so many gurus are wont to do these days)? This
would hardly have caused the Makkan aristocracy to feel
threatened. It is ironic that while the mushrikeen in
Makkah clearly understood the true import of the Prophet’s
message and viewed it as a direct challenge to their
way of life, the vast majority of Muslims today have
failed to grasp its real meaning. Muslims continue to
lead a jahili existence even while openly professing
the faith of Islam.
Why Muslims
have developed such a warped understanding of Islam
and why they have failed to derive any lessons from
the Seerah with which to solve their problems, especially
relating to their collective existence and governance,
are questions that need careful consideration. After
all, Allah says in the Qur’an that the Prophet is the
"best of exemplars" (33:21) and that Muslims
must "obey Allah and obey the Messenger" (4:59).
Most Muslims have not been able to see beyond their
emotional attachment to the Prophet to appreciate the
larger significance of the Seerah. This must now change.
Muslims
also suffer from another misconception based on a faulty
reading of the situation in Makkah. Since the Prophet
and his companions did not physically resist the onslaught
of the mushrikeen, it is argued that they did not resist
at all. Does the absence of physical resistance automatically
mean no resistance at all, or even acquiescence to the
established order? What about the ideological and psychological
challenges posed by the proclamation of the kalimah,
La ilaha il-Allah, Muhammadur Rasool Allah (There is
no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah)?
Such stalwarts of the jahili system in Makkah as Abu
Lahab and Abu Jahl were roundly condemned by the Qur’an
itself (surah 111; 96:9-18). Islam was not silent in
the face of ridicule from the mushrikeen.
Then there
was the challenge to the social system, in which the
aristocracy was split right down the middle. The sons
and daughters of leading figures entered the fold of
Islam, repudiating the existing order and their own
privileged positions in it. We find Abu Sufyan’s daughter
Um Habiba, Utba ibn Rabi’a’s son Hudhaifa, Suhayb ibn
Umair, Sa’ad ibn Abi Waqqas, Zubair ibn al-Awwam, Uthman
ibn Affan and others accepting Islam and repudiating
the prevalent system even though they were its beneficiaries.
What made them give up their privileges and choose a
life that meant suffering and persecution?
These
are questions that Muslims need to consider as they
hold milad celebrations in this month throughout the
world. The Seerah must mean more than rituals and spiritual
exercises; Muslims must follow the Prophet in all activities
in order to make a meaningful difference to their lives
as commanded by Allah.
|