Understanding
and countering Western Islamophobia
By James
Compton Bockmeir
It is
no secret that the media and political establishment
in North America are viciously anti-Islamic. This continent’s
power elite is obsessed with the Islamic movement, insisting
on projecting it as the new "threat" replacing
communism. So the power elite has used its control of
the media to spread anti-Islamic propaganda to the masses,
who unfortunately are taken in by it. Fear of Islam
has spread among the public throughout North America,
as indeed in much of Europe. This pervasive fear of
Islam has been described as "Islamophobia"
by many Muslim commentators.
While
the pervasiveness of Islamophobia is unquestionable,
there is much confusion in the Ummah about its root
cause. Some Muslims attribute the North American establishment’s
Islamophobia merely to lack of proper education about
Islam; others insist that Islamophobia is the result
of too much Jewish influence in America. How far do
these theories explain the extent and intensity of Islamophobia?
Perhaps
the most popular theory is that western leaders fear
Islam simply because they do not understand it. Accordingly,
then, people would get over their fear of the "other"
once they become familiar with it. At first glance this
explanation appears to make some sense. The basic phenomenon
is after all a common occurrence verifiable by both
modern psychology and experience.
Upon closer
scrutiny, however, this theory reveals a significant
flaw:, Islamophobia is not limited to those who are
uneducated about Islam. Most members of the establishment
who are well versed in comparative religion are just
as antagonistic to Islam and the Islamic movement as
their less knowledgeable compatriots. Given these Islamophobic
tendencies even among educated and informed groups,
the theory that Islamophobia is attributable to lack
of knowledge becomes problematic. It is partially correct,
but fails to provide an adequate explanation.
A similarly
prevalent yet far more flawed misconception among Muslims
is that Islamophobia is primarily the result of Jewish
influence. According to this theory, Jews have used
their wealth and influence to swindle America’s leaders
into scapegoating Islam, thus justifying the zionist
occupation of Palestine. Is this correct? True, North
American Jewry is extremely wealthy and powerful, although
politically it is considered incorrect to say so. Nonetheless,
it is simplistic for Muslims to place the blame for
Islamophobia entrely on Jewish shoulders. Jews are indeed
wealthy and influential in relation to their small numbers,
but they still control only a fraction of the world’s
wealth and power. Jews do not command as much wealth
as the Muslim Ummah does, and certainly not as much
as America’s Gentile population.
Given
such limited manpower and resources, how could the Jews
possibly be primarily responsible for the epidemic of
North American Islamophobia? They would have to possess
superhuman intelligence, cunning and expertise to wield
so much influence and control. Islamophobia cannot simply
be a product of Jewish influence; nor does it result
merely from lack of education. What factors, then, can
adequately explain this plague of Islamophobia?
There
is one factor which principally accounts for Islamophobia
in North America: corporate greed. This continent’s
power elite sees the Islamic movement as the new threat
because it threatens their financial and material interests.
Islam’s insistence on social justice threatens the vested
interests of western capitalists. Although Islam allows
private ownership of businesses, the Shari’ah mandates
that such ownership be managed for the public good of
the stakeholders (i.e. workers and the local community).
As Allah tells all the people of the earth, and not
just a wealthy few, "It is He who hath created
for you all things that are on earth . . . " (the
Qur’an: 2:29).
Western
multinational corporations refuse to come to terms with
the Islamic movement’s demand that their companies be
justly administered to serve the public good. The Islamic
Revolution in Iran as well as the Libyan government,
by using oil revenues to benefit their people rather
than western multinationals, have already challenged
western capitalist interests. The western capitalists,
along with their clients in government and the media,
are terrified of possible Islamic revolutions in Palestine,
the Gulf states and Indonesia because such change would
curtail their rapacious greed. Their avarice explains
the intensity of Islamophobia in North America and Europe.
It is
unrealistic to hope that the Ummah can win over North
America’s corporate power elite, nor is this desirable
at this stage. Doing so is not simply a matter of educating
politicians and the media; nor is it simply a matter
of breaking some fictitious death-grip the Jews supposedly
have on America. Rather, the problem lies with the nature
of the American socioeconomic system. Until this system
is toppled, the mainstream media and political establishment
will remain Islamophobic.
There
is always reason for hope, however. While it may be
impossible to cure North America’s power elite of its
Islamophobia, the Ummah can appeal to the continent’s
anticorporate movement. By education and dialogue, Muslims
can help these anticorporate elements to rise above
Islamophobic tendencies that the power elite have instilled
in them. In the process, the Ummah stands to gain both
new allies and new Muslims.
[James
Compton Bockmeir is a student in the US and a reader
of Crescent International.]
|