| January 16-30, 2003 / Editorial | |||||||||
![]()
|
|||||||||
Problems
and responsibilities of Muslims in the West
One
result of events since September 2001 has been some realization of the
true nature of the West even among stubbornly pro-Western Muslims.
Although Muslims around the world had long been aware of the malign
nature of Western power, some had been dazzled by the glamour of the West’s
culture and lifestyle, and taken in by its claims of universal values. With hundreds of Muslims rotting IN Guantanamo
Bay, random assassinations of alleged ‘terrorists’ in many countries,
open warfare against Islamic movements everywhere, a US-client regime
installed by force in Kabul, the blatant manipulation of international
organizations over Iraq, and the effective suspension of the rights of
Muslims even in Western countries, the real nature of the West is now
plain. None
of this is new. The reality behind
the West’s facade has long been evident to those willing to see it, but
many Muslims preferred not to. While Muslims in Muslim countries were
being repressed by West-sponsored despots and dictatorships, Muslims in
Western countries were largely protected by the West’s desire to maintain
its image. Yes, there was Islamophobia and racism, and
yes, Muslims were attacked if they raised issues such as Rushdie’s blasphemy,
the US’s sponsorship of Israel, and other parts of its foreign policy. But there was enough freedom of speech and
action for Muslims to regard these things as the normal stuff of Western
politics. Those who spoke of fundamental
incompatibilities between the West and Islam, and warned of the iron fist
inside the velvet glove, were decried as scaremongers and advocates of
conflict and confrontation. No
more. Had the US reacted rationally to the events of September 11, many
Muslims might have regarded their response as understandable.
Bush’s demand that we declare ourselves with America or with the
terrorists might have seemed more reasonable, and his comment that America
was embarking on a ‘crusade’ might have been dismissed as stupid and thoughtless
were it not for the actions of his regime.
Instead, in its prolonged burst of anger and indignation, Washington
has betrayed itself and its allies. Where
does this leave Muslims in the West?
Where there was a policy of keeping heads down and hoping not to
be noticed, there is now a growing realization that that is not possible.
When the late Dr Kalim Siddiqui (ra) established the Muslim
Parliament of Great Britain, one of his reasons was that he foresaw that
Muslims would come under increasing pressure because of conflict between
Western interests and Islamic movements.
Neither he nor the Muslim Parliament survived to serve British
Muslims, but his vision of a strong, locally-rooted community, able to
look after itself and deal with governments from a position of strength,
is more relevant than ever. (For information on the Muslim Parliament,
see www.islamicthought.org/mp-intro.html.) Establishing
such institutions will be even more difficult now, and take time we do
not have. Instead we must rely
for now on the community leaders and groups that already exist. Their
objectives, understanding and effectiveness vary greatly: some still seem
to believe that the West has a better nature that can be appealed to;
others are concerned with single issues — such as challenging media misrepresentations—
and others seem to be vehicles for opportunistic career-building. Some efforts are wrong-headed and counterproductive. There is resource-wastage,
duplication of effort and in-fighting: this situation is easy for Western
governments to exploit to ensure that Western dominance is not effectively
challenged. It is essential that we find a middle path between the quiescent, secularised pseudo-Islam that is acceptable to the West, and the confrontational, sectarian approach of those whose hero is Usama bin Ladin. Muslim communities are now inseparable parts of all Western populations, and we have responsibilities both to the Muslim Ummah and to the societies of which we are part. We must do what we can to help our fellow Muslims, even against our own governments; we must become examples who guide the non-Muslims among whom we live out of the political, social and ethical morass into which they have fallen. Both tasks demand that we develop institutions and programmes for the protection and service of our own communities, to ensure their survival in circumstances which will probably soon become even more difficult. |
|||||||||