|
US anger turns
to blatant strategic opportunism
More than
two weeks after the attacks on the Pentagon and the
World Trade Centre, the initial shock has worn off and
the prevalent mood has changed to nervous anticipation
as the world waits to see what the US will do next.
The broad terms of the west’s response are already clear,
however. Although George W. Bush and his cohorts were
swearing bloody vengeance in the immediate aftermath,
behind the scenes they were obviously quick to recognise
the attacks as an opportunity rather than a problem,
and set about planning how best to use them to advance
the US’s hegemonic interests. Talk of a quick, hard
strike against the supposed perpetrators turned into
attempts to construct a global coalition against ‘terrorism’,
with the potential of course of being turned against
any or all of America’s enemies and critics around the
world, particularly Islamic movements. It is also clear
now that Washington plans the effective occupation and
domination of Pakistan and Afghanistan, although what
form that domination will take remains to be seen.
The implications
of all this for the Islamic movement and Muslims generally
are, on the face of it, grim. Islamic movements comprise
the main opposition to Western imperialism in the non-Western
world, and will inevitably be the main target of this
new western coalition. Already the list of ‘terrorist’
organisations identified by the US includes groups in
Kashmir, Palestine and Arab countries, as well as Afghanistan.
When Russian president Vladimir Putin signed up to the
coalition, the US immediately identified the Chechen
mujahideen as terrorists, calling on them to end their
supposed links with Osama bin Ladin. The West has long
been at war with Islamic opposition movements around
the world; this war is clearly about to get much bloodier,
and a great many Muslims are going to pay a high price
for their determination to oppose the forces of kufr
that are bleeding our lands dry, and to establish Islam
instead.
Muslims
in western countries are also feeling the heat. In the
US, Britain, Europe, Australia and elsewhere, Muslims
are facing increasingly hostile Islamophobic pressures,
resulting in murders, arson attacks and drive-by shootings
on mosques and Islamic centres, and other kinds of harassment.
Despite the protests of Western politicians such as
Bush and British prime minister Tony Blair that they
have nothing against Islam and are not fighting ‘good’
Muslims, many westerners see that their enemies are
all Muslims and that effective opposition to western
domination is almost invariably in Muslim countries,
and draw their own conclusions. This situation is inevitable,
even understandable, and is likely to get much worse
unless Islamic movements collapse and disappear under
the West’s onslaught, which is unlikely.
Muslim
communities in Western countries must therefore be prepared
to defend themselves, politically and if necessary physically,
although the latter should only be necessary if they
fail politically. This demands that they organise themselves
and have leaders and institutions that can stand up
to Western governments and represent Islamic movements
in western countries, rather than be defensive and apologetic
in the face of the sort of Western propaganda we are
now seeing. Western Muslims must be prepared to say
that we reject the West’s claims to be interested in
democracy, human rights and freedom, and to justify
and explain our support for the causes and struggles
of Islamic movements against Western political and economic
domination. This sort of strength of purpose is essential
for us to hold together as communities and gain the
respect of the world, as well as being the only principled
position to take.
We should
also recognise, however, that this heightened confrontation
demands that we grasp the baton of leadership against
Western dominance. The West’s war is not only with the
Islamic movement; it is with all those who refuse to
accept the West’s right to exploit and manipulate the
world for its own benefit. Islam, however, remains the
only non-Western belief-system and world-view that the
West has failed to destroy, and that retains the potential
to challenge the West. So it is imperative that we make
it clear that our struggle is not only for the Muslims,
but is on behalf of all oppressed non-Western peoples.
We need to understand and explain that this war is between
the West and the Rest, and to show the Rest that Islam
— the true Islam of the Islamic movements, not the stripped-down
Islam that is acceptable to Bush and co. — offers all
oppressed and exploited peoples the possibility of a
better future.
|