| September 2004 | |||||||||
![]()
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive
overview and analysis of the history of Muslims in
Muslims are now a global community, with substantial presences in virtually every country in the world, including every major Western country. Such are the historical and contemporary political contexts of relations between Muslims and Westerners, and the very substantial differences between Muslims and Western attitudes towards many key issues of private and public morality, as well as social organization and public life, that it is inevitable that Muslim communities cannot slot easily into Western societies without considerable adjustment having to be made on both sides. Nor is it surprising that this should prove a bumpy and often painful process, particularly as Western communities and institutions are generally a lot less accustomed to adapting to accommodate Muslims than Muslims have become accustomed to adapting to Western demands and expectations over decades of interaction in which the West has almost invariably held the upper hand. Despite
this, however, the general perception in the West remains not of Muslims
as a flexible and adaptable community who have a baseline of principles
that they will not betray, but as a conservative, rigid and dogmatic
community that refuses to adapt.
In this book Humayun Ansari, director of the Centre for Ethnic
Minority Studies and Equal Opportunities and senior lecturer at the Department
of History at Royal Holloway College, University of London, sets out to
counter Western misunderstandings of the position and role of Muslims
in Britain by use of a truly amazing amount of information, along with
considerable useful analysis of the history of Muslims in Britain.
His aim is to demonstrate firstly how Muslims are far from being
the homogeneous, unvariegated and unchanging mass that they are often
portrayed as, and secondly to humanise British Muslims by demonstrating
how they are facing many of the same issues as other British people, and
are often responding to them in similar ways.
The underlying message, never explicitly articulated, is that it
is not Muslims who have proven to be unadaptable and unable to compromise
to cope with the historical and social consequences of Of
all Western countries, and Muslim communities in Western countries, to
discuss in this way, This
is something Ansari clearly understands, with almost a third of his book
consisting of discussions of the experience of Muslims in Moving
on to the post-war period, Ansari combines a history of the Muslim community
with thematic discussions of key issues, beginning with a statistical
analysis of the patterns of migration, settlement, housing, employment
and education, before moving on to discuss the growing interaction between
Muslims collectively and non-Muslim society, and key issues that have
arisen in this process. The breadth
of material that he synthesises is impressive, and few can seriously take
issue with the analysis he provides of it. On controversial issues such as the Rushdie
ffair, he manages -- unlike many Muslims who write from within western
institutions -- to avoid pandering to liberal prejudices, and his discussion
of Dr Kalim Siddiqui’s attempt to establish a “minority political system
for Muslims in Britain”, based on the Muslim Parliament of Great Britain,
is much fairer than is found in books written by non-Muslims, who tend
to be blinded by Dr Siddiqui’s role in the Rushdie affair.
(Ansari’s analysis is based on that of the All
in all, this is likely to prove a very useful book for those looking for
information and analysis of the Muslim situation in |
|||||||||